Touch for Health Kinesiology Association Journal (year 2002)

successfully used intention to influence the growth rate of bacteria cells. In one experiment, he was able to reduce growth rate of bacteria cultures 50% over controls. Another researcher, Dr. Bernard Grad, has “demonstrated that the absorption spectrum, surface tension, conductivity and acidity of water can be altered by focused thought or intent.”

While studies of distant healing involving human beings are challenging to design because of uncontrollable factors such as hope, expectation, and the healer/patient relationship, there have been several well-designed studies that confirm such an effect. In 1994 California Pacific Medical Center designed a methodologically sound research project with the purpose of determining whether healing intentions over distance is effective. Two double-blind studies were completed using Aids patients as subjects with findings that showed a 40% mortality in the control group but no death in the prayed-for group. Researchers Braud and Schlitz successfully demonstrated in thirteen experiments the ability of 62 people to influence the physiology of 271 distant subjects, who were unaware of the time that the attempt would be made. The effects proved to be consistent and replicable.

Surprise Findings from Intention
Studies

Several research studies have yielded some surprising findings that indicate just how powerful one’s belief and intention can be. In three double-blind studies of the use of
Vitamin E in treating angina pectoris, an enthusiastic doctor who believed in the
efficacy of Vitamin E found it significantly
more effective than a placebo, while two studies conducted by skeptics showed no effect. In another study using a minor tranquilizing drug, three of four studies suggested strongly that the effectiveness of the drug over the placebo was correlated with the physician’s attitudes and beliefs toward it. Its conclusion was that the beliefs of the prescribing physician can somehow penetrate double-blind conditions of the experiment and shape the action of the drug. In yet another scientifically sound double-blind experiment using human subjects, one researcher who

 

believed in distant healing, showed that her subjects had statistically significant increases in autonomic nervous system response, while another skeptical researcher following the same procedures did not obtain any significant results. Again, these inconsistent results have lead researchers to postulate the influence of an “experimenter effect,” or researcher’s bias which can penetrate double-blind studies.

Even more amazing have been studies on intention involving mechanical devices, such as a random event generator (REG). In over 50 million trials over more than 15 years the results overwhelmingly showed that individuals can influence the REG, steering its output from sheer randomness toward a particular pattern. The odds against being a chance happening were a trillion to one. Operators described an emotional bonding with the machines, “becoming one” with the device while they are trying to influence it. These experiments conducted at PEAR lab at Princeton University show clearly that the effects of emphatic bonding transcend space and even time. Operators were asked to influence the machines output ‘after’ it had run, and the results were identical to efforts made in the present. Helmut Schmidt, a physicist, found similar results showing that subjects can influence the output of a REG after the machine had run. Esteemed statisticians estimate the likelihood of Schmidt’s results being due to chance at seven million to one. Schmidt’s experiments appear to indicate that past subatomic events are malleable, capable of being influenced mentally, even though they have already occurred and been recorded in some way, so long as they have not been consciously observed. In quantum physics, too, looking, or the ‘observer effect,’ converts possibilities and potentialities into actual events and fixes them. Could this concept not apply to a person receiving a medical diagnosis?

Distinctions between Energy/ Psychic/ Spiritual Healing

Energy and psychic healers, whether in contact or at a distance from the client, hold a specific intent of replenishing or manipulating the ‘energy flows’ or symptoms of the client. Psychic and energy healing modalities (in general) involve training, conscious effort,

Next Page

Back